Full Transcript: 2007-12-02 – Open Floor

December 2, 2007
Troy Tolley, Channel

MICHAEL SPEAKS – Open Floor

[Question] When Troy posted the Chief Features of the presidential candidates, he said the Akashic features were being accessed, have not heard mention of this distinction, can you clarify?

[Michael_Entity] Through some of our channels and students it has become clear, through questioning and observation, that there are three versions of an individual’s Essence and Personality Profile: the Private Version (that which you wish for your Overleaves to be), the Public Version (that which others assume you are), and your Akashic, or True Overleaves, which are on record and may or may not coincide with the projected overleaves (private) and/or the expected overleaves (public). These variations have always been in effect due to variations of clarity among channels, but only recently have the channels begun to truly explore the apparent discrepancies. All three can lend insights to a Personality and a life, so we do not imply that one is better than another. They are simply different angles of approach to understanding the Personality. In many cases, for instance, regarding public figures, our channels and students often interpret the fragment by the persona seen through the filters of media, thus interpreting aspects of the profile to fit those observations, instead of reading the True Overleaves.

[Question] For the chief features, though, I don’t understand. Since, supposedly, according to Michael, it is a pivotal event that is the catalyst to put us into our chief feature and it is not pre-chosen?

[Michael_Entity] You are correct. Chief Negative Features are not pre-chosen. This, however, has nothing to do with an individual’s interpretation of himself or his interpretation of another person versus the Akashic version of either. We will give you an example: A fragment in Arrogance may not see himself as Arrogant, but sees himself as Impatient, since he equates his quick judgment of people as a form of intolerance. Still others may interpret him as Stubborn because he avoids intimate situations and does not budge from that stance. Those interpretations from the self or from others does not change the fact that on record his fears are rooted in Vulnerability, or Arrogance. Each version will lend insight, especially if understood within the proper context. It is Good Work to understand how others see you, and how you see yourself, and how you ARE. That is triad of self.

[Question] Like so many others, we work thru life issues in dreams. Intense dreams with water….flooding. dark, raging storms or instant floods…swim through…waking up up very emotionally spent. Please explain the flooding in dreams. thank you.

[Michael_Entity] It is true that one level of dreaming is for the processing of events. In many cases the universal symbols are used to work through these events, such as Water equating levels of emotions. It could be said, then, that these descriptions you lend to your symbol of water are equated with the same descriptions you would give to some obvious experiences of emotion (or fears) in your waking life. However, what tends to be even more insightful in your dreaming is your position relative to the symbol. If you are drowning, the “meaning” can be very different from if you are managing a rocking ship.

It is always a more direct and accurate route of dream interpretation for the individual to write down what the symbols mean to himself or herself and then put it back into the context of the dream and assess how those symbols interact with each other and the dreamer.

In general, though, water is often used by fragments to symbolize emotions, or the lower astral plane (emotional plane).

[Question] I’ve been reading a lot of previous groups’ postings from the Michael groups and have answered more than one of my questions; however, “essence mates,” from other grand cycle ETs, remains inexplicable. Can you elaborate on them and the role they play in many of our current lives or cycles, and conversely our role in theirs?

[Michael_Entity] They rarely play a significant role beyond the opportunity for Essence Recognition, which is the only form of true evolution. In that regard, they are highly significant, but that is not exclusive to an Essence Mate; all fragments with which you have had past contact are potential opportunities for Essence Recognition. Essence Mates could be likened to an “Ex” with which you have had a relationship that ran its course and transitioned positively with total closure; the nostalgia and resonance is warm and soft, with undertones of deep appreciation, but no charge; no intensity. Spending an entire Grand Cycle with a fragment leaves even the “spark” with the “memories.” This is because a Grand Cycle to your Essence/Spark is like a single lifetime is to your Role, taking with it the memories most resonate and impactful.

An Essence Mate can often be included in the new cycle as a significant relationship again within this new context, but that is a relationship between Roles, not the Sparks, and “Essence Mate” refers to the Sparks’ relationship.

We will include here that what we mean by “Essence Recognition” is the profound “knowing” that one has a relationship with another fragment or self beyond the present version. We will also include the note that, while “Essence” and “Role” are often used interchangeably, they are technically different: the Essence takes on a Role, hence your Essence Role, or Role in Essence, but your Essence, itself, does not have a Role.

[Question] More like Traveling Companions?

[Michael_Entity] No, Traveling Companions are yours because of current-cycle mathematical associations. Essence Mates do not necessarily have any mathematical resonance and ties. They are simply remembered.

[Question] My question concerns identifying Input sources when one is receiving information/energy from a source beyond one’s self, whether in channeling, tarot, dreams, etc. I once had a dream in which Michael said, “Every time you have thought is was us, it was us.” Could you give me specific ways that a student who is openly seeking contact might know when they have contact with the Michael entity, as opposed to their Essence, guides, or other teachers? In what ways might we experience Michael’s influence in our daily lives, when the channels are not around?

[Michael_Entity] We try to be as present as possible for all who call upon us, even if the channel is a “fraud” and even if the student is “delusional.” We are aware of when any of you call upon us. Our presence, however, is as clear through a channel, or to a student, as that person is with himself or herself. This is why many of you who begin accessing higher sources of contact (for lack of a better phrase), whether this is us, or your own “Higher Self,” the voice or energy “sounds like you,” or feels like your own imagination. This is because it is a necessary part of the process in clearing out a channel to a higher source that you first clear out all of your own ideas, prejudices, and presumption about what should happen or what should be the responses to your inquiries.

One of the easiest and most direct ways of learning to differentiate our energy from your own is to go ahead, freely, with your use of imagination as your form of contact. Imagination is the highest frequency owned by a physical fragment and its use is entirely misunderstood by many, at least in terms of its use for “extra-sensory” perceptions. As you keep track of your contact, you will begin to notice glimpses of validation for contact with us that are clearly not “you.”

There is not as easy a differentiation when accessing your Higher Self (Essence), however, as that IS you to a great degree. But that is not your question, so we will not elaborate at this time.

We can also add that many of our channels and students interpret our energy as Blue, as a Crowd, as literal images of Kings/Warriors, and as a sphere of some kind. These are only a few examples, but each finds his or her own means of interpreting us.

We’ve seen our energy interpreted by your dreams as a medallion in the past.

[Question] Hello Michael! I was really fascinated by last month’s message about how to develop one’s communication with Michael. Can you elaborate on the part about how to build strength in the axes where we lack emphasis in our charts?

[Michael_Entity] Yes. This is already in the works with Troy in his posting an “MBlog” entry soon, which will elaborate on this. A response to your question will be found there.

[Question] We’ve had discussion threads about the different feel to different Channels of You. Is the primary difference due to different fragment groups being accessed within You?

[Michael_Entity] We have elaborated on this question in the past, and will include it with Troy’s edited transcript of this session. This may shed a great deal of light on your question. (NOTE: see excerpt added at end of transcript)

We can say to you now, however, that the accessing of various groups of fragments among us through different channels has the least significance in what you experience as differences. This is often used to explain the differences, but it has little, if no bearing.

We are a reunited entity and speak as one, regardless of the representative speaking for us. We are not fragmented into groups and we do not run our communications among us from separate “cubicles” that do not interact or share the same perception. We do not have various personalities and we do not have different things to say from among us. These explanations are conveniences created from various levels of understand of the process of channels as a means to explain discrepancies and variations of feel and expression, but they are not valid.

The primary differences are found in the level of agreement with us for communicating our teaching and the level of presence from the personality conveying our energy, whether verbally or non-verbally.

We will conclude here. Good day to all of you. Goodbye.

ADDITIONAL CHANNELING:

[Question] Please elucidate on the type of channeling agreements you have with students, Michael?

[Michael_Entity] We have three tiers of Agreements with fragments who work with us in the form of “Channeling.”

“Primary Students” are those fragments with whom we share Agreements that extend across many lifetimes and, of course, from before birth for this current lifetime. Our teaching is used by these students as one of their primary philosophies, if not their only philosophy.

“Primary Channels” are those fragments with whom we share Agreements that extend across lifetimes and, of course, from before birth for this lifetime to use our teaching as a primary philosophy, and to help impart our teaching as a primary philosophy by giving us a medium of expression into the physical plane to our Primary Students.

“Secondary Students” are those fragments with whom we share no original Agreement, but we develop an Agreement to accommodate their experimental exposure to our teaching. These fragments will most likely take only parts of our teaching as needed and not use it at a primary philosophy.

“Secondary Channels” are those fragments with whom we share no original Agreement to act as our channel, but we develop an Agreement to accommodate these fragments who feel a strong drive to build their own teaching upon our philosophy. (note: Michael has said that most of their channels come from this category)

“Tertiary Students” are those fragments with whom we share no original Agreement and the student may never find valid contact with a channel, but we develop an Agreement to help guide in the use of our teaching as they might choose to use it as a guide for a period of time.

“Tertiary Channels” are those fragments with whom we share no original Agreement, and these fragments do not have valid verbal channeling skills, but we develop an Agreement to help build those skills, even as he or she may grossly misrepresent himself, herself, or our teachings. In other words, anyone claiming to channel us will automatically find a connection to us, though their ability to hear or convey us may be severely limited, despite their eagerness and sense of connection to us. These channels are most often noted for the valid and powerful “energy work” that is felt from us when working through them, even as the verbal channeling is lacking in clarity or accuracy.

“Regulators” are those fragments with whom we have Agreements (which may or may not have been generated before birth) to not only gather tangible records of all works offered by our Primary and Secondary Channels, but to help question, authenticate, and validate (and invalidate) this material.

In some cases, there are overlapping Agreements, such as an Agreement to be a Regulator while also being a Primary Channel or Student.

Ultimately, we come to all who ask. Our teaching is accessible to anyone.