Motion and The Physical Universe

[Excerpt from TT: 1999-08-19]

[Fg] Our science has long adhered to the “building block” concept of the material world, and to that end has been looking for the ultimate particle which everything is made of. There is another theory out there that says they’ll never find it because motion is the sole constituent of the physical universe. Is that theory valid from Michael’s perspective, because it sure has enormous explanatory power?

[Michael_Entity] At this point we would agree there is no foundation to be discovered that is tangible by Physical standards. To describe “motion as the sole constituent of the Physical Universe” is quite accurate since all things spring from the Buddhaic Plane, that of Higher Moving Energy.

Incidentally, there are Parallels where this has been satisfied as an area of exploration, but these are Parallels where Mystics, Channels and Psychics are considered the “scientists”. It will most likely take the serious consideration of that culture for this to be satisfied “here” too. You see this beginning in what you call “Quantum Physics”.

[bn] Do you see a “Unified Field Theory” being found within the next century?

[Michael_Entity] No. There are too many areas that could be considered distractions from this exploration.

As the new Century manifests, most will be concerned with the practical application and implementation of the jolting effects of technology and science as seen in the latter 20th Century. Understanding and applying what has come will take precedence over achieving more.

We answered, by the way, with what we see as highest probability, but this is not a prediction. Even if a theory were found it would take the entire century to “test” it and investigate it.