[Excerpt from TT: 2011-06-12]
[Martha] At Claymont, JP said something about the first 100 cadres or entities, and the last 100, would stay here for the duration of our species’ incarnations. Not every single fragment or entity within each 100, but that the first and last 100 had committed to staying around. Do you agree? And if so can you elaborate on it?
[MEntity] We would agree. Though this does not mean a limitation to the incarnational process of the Physical Plane, but includes all lower planes. Those of us from “the beginning” and “the end” of the count for Sentience to this Design will be supporting, teaching, and even incarnating “somewhere” within the Physical, Astral, or Causal Planes.
[Excerpt from TT: 2009-07-13]
[Question] I have a question about the influence of past cycles. It there are two fragments, A and B. Fragment A has completed 15 cycles as a human being. Fragment B has no previous cycles. If both are beginning a new grand cycle, how would the perspective of A be different from B in the Infant stage? Generally how would the experience of the entire new cycle be different?
May 1, 2005
Troy Tolley, Channel
MICHAEL SPEAKS – Open Floor
[M Entity] Hello to all of you. We are here.
[freyaisissuz] Michael has said in the past that in the teacher-student relationship we may learn from them and they learn from us. That indicates to me an evolving teaching. Do they still say that is true, and in what ways are we learning from each other today? How are we All doing?
[M Entity] Of course we remain learning from you as much as you learn from us.
[Excerpt from TT: 2005-05-01]
[Fyredeva11] On another list, someone brought up the question of validity that 2 persons channeled as being in the same entity are ACTUALLY FROM the same entity, given that there must be tens of thousands of cadre groups each with Entity 1/5, for example. I ask this in skepticism of having so many channeled celebrities in our cadre. It seems to fall under the need for “specialness” you just spoke of.