Three Tiers of Channeling Agreements

[Excerpt from TT: 2005-11-06]

[freyaisissuz] We would like comment from Michael about exactly what is a secondary conscious channel with an agreement with Michael. Thanks

[M Entity] We are unclear as to what your question is.

]freyaisissuz] What does Michael say is a ‘secondary conscious channel’ so students will better understand the concept?

[M Entity] We do not recognize the phrase as being a part of our teaching, though one of our channels may have chosen it as a means to convey a concept.

[freyaisissuz] It is information given to Al by a Michael channel.

[upstaate] it was channeled that Al had an agreement with the Michaels, using the phrase, “as a secondary channel” A fragment will have an agreement to be a primary channel. What is a secondary? secondary conscious channel, that is

[kittlekats41] would ‘conscious channel’ mean as opposed to a trance channel perhaps?

[freyaisissuz] That’s how Al understood it, Kate.

[M Entity] We would suggest asking that channel, as this phrasing did not originate with us. We suspect this is a phrasing used by our channels to describe a fragment with whom we have agreements to channel through, but not on a largely, public scale. It is not uncommon for certain phrasing to be generated by the channel as a means to convey a concept we have not created phrases for, ourselves.

[freyaisissuz] That makes more sense, he doesn’t care to go back to the previous channel.

[kittlekats41] Would you have time perhaps to elucidate on the type of channeling agreements you have with students, Michael?

[freyaisissuz] Excellent, much better phrasing, Kathryn – Al

[M Entity] We do not have time, but that is simply the nature of our plane.

We will conclude here, but include a response to that final question for the transcript.

[ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO FINAL QUESTION]

(disclaimer: I am asking this questions as best I understood it, but I am uncertain if I conveyed it to Michael in the way the questioner meant it.)

Please elucidate on the type of channeling agreements you have with students, Michael?

[M Entity] We have three tiers of Agreements with fragments who work with us in the form of “Channeling.”

“Primary Students” are those fragments with whom we share Agreements that extend across many lifetimes and, of course, from before birth for this current lifetime. Our teaching is used by these students as one of their primary philosophies, if not their only primary philosophy.

“Primary Channels” are those fragments with whom we share Agreements that extend across lifetimes and, of course, from before birth for this lifetime to use our teaching as a primary philosophy, and to help impart our teaching as a primary philosophy by giving us a medium of expression into the physical plane to our Primary Students.

“Secondary Students” are those fragments with whom we share no original Agreement, but we develop an Agreement to accommodate their experimental exposure to our teaching. These fragments will most likely take only parts of our teaching as needed and not use it at a primary philosophy.

“Secondary Channels” are those fragments with whom we share no original Agreement to act as our channel, but we develop an Agreement to accommodate these fragments who feel a strong drive to build their own teaching upon our philosophy.

“Tertiary Students” are those fragments with whom we share no original Agreement and the student may never find valid contact with a channel, but we develop an Agreement to help guide in the use of our teaching as they might choose to use it as a guide for a period of time.

“Tertiary Channels” are those fragments with whom we share no original Agreement, and these fragments do not have valid channeling skills, but we develop an Agreement to help build those skills, even as he or she may grossly misrepresent himself or herself. In other words, anyone claiming to channel us will automatically find a connection to us, though their ability to hear or convey us may be severely limited, despite their eagerness and sense of connection to us.

“Regulators” are those fragments with whom we have Agreements (which may or may not have been generated before birth) to not only gather tangible records of all works offered by our Primary and Secondary Channels, but to help question, authenticate, and validate (and invalidate) this material.

In some cases, there is overlapping Agreements, such as an Agreement to be a Regulator while also being a Primary Channel or Student.

Ultimately, we come to all who ask. Our teaching is accessible to anyone.